Personal Web Page

Climate change impacts could amplify global inequalities even under ambitious GHG emission reduction policies

In NEWS, Publications on 10/08/2016 at 11:17

A new study conducted by a team of researchers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Italy,  and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), the Netherlands, examine the possible consequences climate change mitigation and adaptation policies could have on global inequalities. The study is particularly relevant from a policy viewpoint in the context of/in the light of the historical climate agreement reached last year in Paris. Results have been produced within the context of the FP7 European project LIMITS led by Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), and have been published by the international journal Environmental Research Letter in the article “Alleviating inequality in climate policy costs: an integrated perspective on mitigation, damage and adaptation“.

“The perception of fairness has always played an important role in climate negotiations and policymakers care about the regional distribution of climate costs. Yet, the scientific literature has mostly focused on the distributional implications of mitigation policies only, without considering the damages remaining and the adaptation measures needed to cope with them. This study shows that the distribution of damages and adaptation costs remains unequal even under a 2 degree stabilization policy.” says Enrica De Cian, senior researcher at FEEM e del CMCC. The study utilizes two integrated assessment models to examine five emission reduction policy scenarios and to compare three different effort sharing schemes distributing the global mitigation effort: 1) greater mitigation effort where costs are lower, 2) distribution of the mitigation effort so as to equalize regional mitigation costs, 3) distribution of the mitigation effort so as to equalize total climate costs, including mitigation, residual damages, and adaptation. The study shows that not considering the latter two cost items, damages and adaptation, could amplify the inequalities already created by mitigation policies. A global carbon market and international emission trading could compensate the countries mostly affected by mitigation, adaptation, and damage costs. Such instrument, however, requires a broader view on equity that explicitly considers the regional disparities in total climate costs, including damages and adaptation. The additional financial transfers needed to compensate residual damages and adaptation costs could reach the order of magnitude of five hundred billion dollars in 2050, even under an ambitious mitigation policy stabilizing global average temperature increase below 2 degree Celsius compared to the pre-industrial levels.

Massimo Tavoni, coordinator of the research program “Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways” at FEEM and principal investigator of the LIMITS project, says that we need more studies like this one. “Equity considerations should take into account all cost items associated with climate change. For the first time, the Paris Agreement has included adaptation as a long-term, global goal together with mitigation, certainly calling for more research on the interaction between mitigation, residual damages, and adaptation.”

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s